anthropics/skills vs K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
anthropics/skills scores higher overall: 81/100 (A-tier) against 77/100 (A-tier). anthropics/skills leads on reliability, documentation, safety; K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills leads on skill leverage, maintenance, evaluation readiness. Scored 2026-07-07, methodology v1.0.
Dimension by dimension
| Dimension | anthropic-skills | scientific-agent-skills |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 78 | 70 |
| Skill Leverage | 82 | 84 |
| Documentation | 88 | 80 |
| Maintenance | 85 | 90 |
| Safety / Governance | 80 | 68 |
| Evaluation Readiness | 60 | 72 |
| Composability | 88 | 74 |
| Adoption (capped) | 90 | 84 |
| Overall | 81 · A | 77 · A |
The entries
Anthropic's first-party public skill collection: the de facto reference for SKILL.md structure, frontmatter conventions, and…
140 domain skills plus 100+ database connectors that turn a coding agent into a working research assistant for biology, chemistry, medicine,…
Frequently asked questions
anthropics/skills or K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills?
anthropics/skills scores higher overall (81 vs 77, methodology v1.0). But they are the same category, so the dimension table below is the real answer.
How is this comparison generated?
Both scorecards come from the same public rubric with evidence notes, scored by the same editorial process. This page presents them side by side; it adds no new judgments beyond the scores themselves.