superpowers vs gstack: which Claude Code skill framework?

Both are A-tier. obra/superpowers (83/100) wins on trigger design and universal process skills that fire automatically. garrytan/gstack (80/100) wins on workflow breadth: ship, QA, deploy, and multi-perspective review pipelines. Pick superpowers for discipline, gstack for coverage, or run both. Scored 2026-07-07, methodology v1.0.

Side-by-side scorecard

Dimensionsuperpowersgstack
Reliability8480
Skill Leverage9086
Documentation8278
Maintenance9288
Safety / Governance7472
Evaluation Readiness6670
Composability8476
Adoption (capped)9288
Overall83 · A-tier80 · A-tier

scored 2026-07-07 · metrics fetched 2026-07-07

Choose superpowers if

  • You want process guarantees on every task without remembering to invoke anything.
  • Your failure mode is agents declaring false success or skipping verification.
  • You value trigger precision and boundary discipline as first-class craft.

Choose gstack if

  • You want an opinionated pipeline from plan review to landed PR.
  • You work solo and want the review structure a team would provide.
  • Browser-based QA loops matter to your product surface.

The entries

Frequently asked questions

Should I use superpowers or gstack?

Use superpowers if you want always-on process discipline (TDD, debugging, verification) that auto-triggers across every task. Use gstack if you want explicit, operator-driven workflow coverage from plan review through ship and QA. Many teams run both; they overlap less than their categories suggest.

Can superpowers and gstack be used together?

Yes. superpowers skills auto-trigger on process (how work happens); gstack skills are slash-commands for pipelines (what happens next). The known friction point is review: both ship review workflows, so teams should pick one as canonical.