sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc vs PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules
PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules scores higher overall: 57/100 (B-tier) against 55/100 (B-tier). sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc leads on reliability, documentation, composability; PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules leads on maintenance, adoption. Scored 2026-07-07, methodology v1.0.
Dimension by dimension
| Dimension | awesome-cursor-rules-mdc | awesome-cursorrules |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 48 | 45 |
| Skill Leverage | 60 | 60 |
| Documentation | 72 | 70 |
| Maintenance | 62 | 75 |
| Safety / Governance | 50 | 50 |
| Evaluation Readiness | 30 | 30 |
| Composability | 66 | 65 |
| Adoption (capped) | 58 | 84 |
| Overall | 55 · B | 57 · B |
The entries
A curated collection of Cursor rules in the modern .mdc format, organized by library and framework. The .mdc counterpart to the older…
The largest collection of Cursor rules files, organized by framework and stack. A discovery source for instruction-file patterns rather than…
Frequently asked questions
sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc or PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules?
PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules scores higher overall (57 vs 55, methodology v1.0). But they are the same category, so the dimension table below is the real answer.
How is this comparison generated?
Both scorecards come from the same public rubric with evidence notes, scored by the same editorial process. This page presents them side by side; it adds no new judgments beyond the scores themselves.