VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills vs PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules
PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules scores higher overall: 57/100 (B-tier) against 56/100 (B-tier). VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills leads on documentation, maintenance; PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules leads on reliability, skill leverage, safety. Scored 2026-07-07, methodology v1.0.
Dimension by dimension
| Dimension | voltagent-awesome-agent-skills | awesome-cursorrules |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 42 | 45 |
| Skill Leverage | 58 | 60 |
| Documentation | 72 | 70 |
| Maintenance | 86 | 75 |
| Safety / Governance | 48 | 50 |
| Evaluation Readiness | 28 | 30 |
| Composability | 62 | 65 |
| Adoption (capped) | 80 | 84 |
| Overall | 56 · B | 57 · B |
The entries
A 1000+ entry aggregator of agent skills across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and Cursor. Wide coverage, minimal curation signal.
The largest collection of Cursor rules files, organized by framework and stack. A discovery source for instruction-file patterns rather than…
Frequently asked questions
VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills or PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules?
PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules scores higher overall (57 vs 56, methodology v1.0). But they are the same category, so the dimension table below is the real answer.
How is this comparison generated?
Both scorecards come from the same public rubric with evidence notes, scored by the same editorial process. This page presents them side by side; it adds no new judgments beyond the scores themselves.