confident-ai/deepeval

A-Tier scored 2026-07-07 metrics 2026-07-07

A pytest-style LLM evaluation framework: metric classes for correctness, hallucination, RAG quality, and agent task completion, written as unit tests. Agentiquette scores it 80/100 (A-tier), methodology v1.0, scored 2026-07-07.

80/100 A-Tier
scored 2026-07-07 · methodology v1.0 · how we score
Reliability7625%
Skill Leverage8020%
Documentation8215%
Maintenance9010%
Safety / Governance6610%
Evaluation Readiness9210%
Composability805%
Adoption (capped)825%

Key facts

CategoryEvaluation / observability
LicenseApache-2.0
MaintainerConfident AI
Compatible agentsgeneric
File patterns
Triggeringmanual-reference
GitHub metrics16,697 stars · 1,624 forks · 351 open issues (fetched 2026-07-07)
Last commit2026-07-06
Created2023-08-10

Editorial analysis

The pytest framing is the insight: evaluation adoption fails on workflow friction, and putting LLM checks where engineers already run checks dissolves it. Agent-specific metrics (task completion, tool correctness) are newer and thinner than the RAG metrics, which are mature. Pairs naturally with promptfoo rather than competing.

Risks

Metric quality varies: the classic assertion metrics are solid, the more judgmental ones need calibration against your own labels before you trust a red/green.

Evidence notes: Eval readiness: metrics are assertable and CI-native. Docs: quickstart ran as written. Reliability: deterministic metrics strong; LLM-judge metrics documented with their variance caveats.

Install and first run

install · verified by running it
pip install deepeval

Alternatives in this category

Compare with promptfoo · Compare with langfuse

Embed this badge

Maintainers of scored entries can embed their live badge; it updates when the score does and links back to this page.

Agentiquette: A tier, 80/100

README.md
[![Agentiquette](https://agentiquette.com/badge/deepeval.svg)](https://agentiquette.com/index/repos/deepeval)

Frequently asked questions

Is confident-ai/deepeval good?

confident-ai/deepeval scores 80/100 (A-tier) on Agentiquette's methodology v1.0, scored 2026-07-07. Strengths and weaknesses are in the editorial analysis; the score is explained dimension by dimension in the scorecard.

What is confident-ai/deepeval for?

A pytest-style LLM evaluation framework: metric classes for correctness, hallucination, RAG quality, and agent task completion, written as unit tests.

Is confident-ai/deepeval maintained?

Last commit 2026-07-06, 351 open issues at fetch time (2026-07-07). Maintenance is scored at 90 of 100.

Maintainer of confident-ai/deepeval? Claim this listing and suggest corrections.